🆚 Entypo vs. Material Icons
- 📈 Material Icons is noticeably more popular than Entypo.
- 🌎 Material Icons is more popular in the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Entypo is more popular in Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands.
Type
About
Entypo is an open-source SVG icon library that provides over 400 interface and social pictograms.
Earlier versions also offered an icon font format, which can still be obtained through third-party services such as Fontello and
Fontastic.
Material Icons is an official icon library created by Google that provides standardized interface icons designed according to the Material Design guidelines.
The set includes thousands of icons across categories such as navigation, communication, media, and editing, and is available in SVG, PNG, and icon font formats, with variants such as filled, outlined, rounded, sharp, and two-tone styles.
Headquarters
Pricing
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥉 Third most popular in Germany in the Icons category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in the Netherlands in the Icons category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Austria in the Icons category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Iran in the Icons category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Denmark in the Icons category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the Icons category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Korea in the Icons category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Malaysia in the Icons category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Norway in the Icons category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Belarus in the Icons category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.