🆚 ES6 Shim vs. Picturefill
- 📈 Picturefill is much more popular than ES6 Shim.
- 🌍 Picturefill is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Provides compatibility shims so that legacy JavaScript engines behave as closely as possible to ECMAScript 6 (Harmony).
A responsive image polyfill for <picture>, srcset, sizes, and more.
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #254
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #70
Legacy › Rank #66
Legacy › Rank #12
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Picturefill JavaScript library is 44 times more popular than ES6 Shim.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Legacy
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Picturefill is more popular than ES6 Shim in all countries.
United States
Germany
Japan
United Kingdom
Brazil
France
Spain
Italy
Netherlands
Australia
Awards
- ⬆️ 52nd most popular in France in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 59th most popular in Germany in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 62nd most popular in the United States in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 223rd most popular in France in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 235th most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Estonia in the Legacy category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Switzerland in the Legacy category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Portugal in the Legacy category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Germany in the Legacy category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Sweden in the Legacy category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Picturefill is more popular than ES6 Shim in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Travel
Health
Internet Services
Entertainment
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Picturefill
Regenerator
Babel