🆚 FeedBurner vs. JSON Feed
- 📈 JSON Feed is much more popular than FeedBurner.
- 🌍 JSON Feed is more popular in all countries.
FeedBurner
JSON FeedType
About
FeedBurner is a web feed management service from Google that enhances 
RSS and Atom feeds with delivery optimization, subscriber tracking, and basic analytics for publishers.
It provides feed redirection and caching, subscriber statistics, and feed formatting. Historically, it also included email subscriptions and feed monetization, though these were later removed.
JSON Feed is a web syndication format that delivers website updates and published content in 
JSON instead of 
XML-based formats such as RSS and Atom.
It defines a structured feed format with support for articles, summaries, authors, tags, attachments, and custom extensions, and is commonly used by blogs, news sites, podcast platforms, and APIs.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the Syndication category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Russia in the Syndication category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Germany in the Syndication category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Ukraine in the Syndication category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Romania in the Syndication category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the Faroe Islands in the Syndication category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Bermuda in the Syndication category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Curacao in the Syndication category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Syndication category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Syndication category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Google company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,795 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.