🆚 Font Awesome vs. Material Icons

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Icon library
Icon library

About

Font Awesome is a toolkit of web fonts and icon sets that lets developers embed scalable icons via CSS, JavaScript, or SVG.

It includes over 2,000 free icons across classic and brand packs, and provides access to more than 50,000 icons in the Pro version.

Material Icons is an official icon library created by Google that provides standardized interface icons designed according to the Material Design guidelines.

The set includes thousands of icons across categories such as navigation, communication, media, and editing, and is available in SVG, PNG, and icon font formats, with variants such as filled, outlined, rounded, sharp, and two-tone styles.

Headquarters

Bentonville, Arkansas, United States
Mountain View, California, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️
Pro Lite$49/year
Pro$99/year
Pro Max$499/year
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

Icons › Rank #1
Icons › Rank #4

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Font Awesome icon library is 38 times more popular than Material Icons.
Total websites

Market share

Icons

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Font Awesome is more popular than Material Icons in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Japan
France
Italy
Spain
India
Netherlands
Brazil

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Font Awesome is more popular than Material Icons in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Internet Services
Entertainment
Health
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
General News

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#1,111
#1,154
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.