🆚 Freestar vs. RevContent
- 📈 RevContent is noticeably more popular than Freestar.
- 🌎 RevContent is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Canada.
- 🌍 Freestar is more popular in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Australia.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Advertising technology
Advertising technology
About
Freestar offers header bidding technology that maximizes programmatic monetization for enterprise publishers.
RevContent is a monetization and recommendation engine that connects advertisers to highly engaged audiences.
Headquarters
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Categories
Advertising › Rank #87
Advertising › Rank #68
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
RevContent advertising technology is 1.6 times more popular than Freestar.
Total websites
Market share
Advertising
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
RevContent is more popular in the United States, Germany, and Canada, while Freestar is more popular in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Australia.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Canada
Brazil
Poland
France
Italy
Spain
Turkey
Awards
- ⬆️ 55th most popular in the United States in the Advertising category.
- ⬆️ 35th most popular in the United States in the Advertising category.
- ⬆️ 66th most popular in Germany in the Advertising category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
RevContent is more popular among sites focused on general news, entertainment, and online shopping, while Freestar is more commonly used on blogs and wiki, sports, and marketing and merchandising sites.
General News
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki
Online Shopping
Sports
Marketing/Merchandising
Public Information
Business
Education/Reference
Fashion/Beauty
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.