🆚 MGID vs. RevContent
- 📈 MGID is twice as popular as RevContent.
- 🌍 MGID is more popular in Turkey, Indonesia, and Germany.
- 🌎 RevContent is more popular in the United States, Canada, and Belgium.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Advertising technology
Advertising technology
About
MGID is a performance-driven platform for real-time buying, selling and management of native ads.
RevContent is a monetization and recommendation engine that connects advertisers to highly engaged audiences.
Headquarters
Santa Monica, California, United States
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Categories
Advertising › Rank #39
Advertising › Rank #68
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
MGID advertising technology is 2.1 times more popular than RevContent.
Total websites
Market share
Advertising
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
MGID is more popular in Turkey, Indonesia, and Germany, while RevContent is more popular in the United States, Canada, and Belgium.
United States
Turkey
Indonesia
Germany
Brazil
India
Italy
Poland
Ukraine
Vietnam
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Indonesia in the Advertising category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Vietnam in the Advertising category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Nigeria in the Advertising category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Ukraine in the Advertising category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in India in the Advertising category.
- ⬆️ 35th most popular in the United States in the Advertising category.
- ⬆️ 66th most popular in Germany in the Advertising category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
MGID is more popular among sites focused on blogs and wiki, business, and marketing and merchandising, while RevContent is more commonly used on general news, entertainment, and online shopping sites.
General News
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Online Shopping
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Sports
Fashion/Beauty
Finance/Banking
Public Information
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
TripleLift