🆚 Google Cloud Load Balancer vs. Oracle Traffic Director
- 📈 Google Cloud Load Balancer is much more popular than Oracle Traffic Director.
- 🌍 Google Cloud Load Balancer is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Oracle Traffic Director is particularly popular in Spain.
Statistics based on 3.4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Load balancer
Load balancer
About
Google Cloud Load Balancer distributes user traffic across virtual machine instances in the same region.
Oracle Traffic Director is a high-throughput, low-latency layer-7 software load balancer for load balancing HTTP/S and TCP traffic to the application tier.
Headquarters
Mountain View, California, United States
Austin, Texas, United States
Categories
Load Balancers › Rank #2
Load Balancers › Rank #18
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Google Cloud Load Balancer is 10,517 times more popular than Oracle Traffic Director.
Total websites
Market share
Load Balancers
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Google Cloud Load Balancer is more popular than Oracle Traffic Director in all countries.
United States
United Kingdom
Japan
Germany
British Virgin Islands
Canada
Brazil
France
Australia
Italy
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the British Virgin Islands in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Brazil in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Taiwan in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Israel in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Mexico in the Load Balancers category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Google Cloud Load Balancer is more popular than Oracle Traffic Director in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Entertainment
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Sports
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
General News
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
F5 BIG-IP