🆚 Google Sites vs. RapidWeaver

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Website builder
Website builder

About

Google Sites is a free, simple, drag-and-drop, WYSIWYG website builder by Google.

RapidWeaver is a website builder for MacOS that allows you to visually build responsive, mobile-ready websites.

Headquarters

Mountain View, California, United States
Brighton, United Kingdom

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️
Free version ❌
RapidWeaver 9$89/year
Aspen Theme$29.99
Marvel Theme$29.99
Royale Theme$29.99

Categories

Website Builders › Rank #21
Website Builders › Rank #18

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The RapidWeaver website builder is 1.2 times more popular than Google Sites.
Total websites

Market share

Website Builders

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

RapidWeaver is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom, while Google Sites is more popular in Japan, Spain, and Brazil.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Australia
Italy
Canada
Switzerland
Japan
France

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

RapidWeaver is more popular among sites focused on business, marketing and merchandising, and education and reference, while Google Sites is more commonly used on blogs and wiki, non-profit, advocacy and NGO, and sports sites.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Entertainment
Internet Services
Blogs/Wiki
Online Shopping
Software/Hardware
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Travel

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#14,103
#22,523
#208,634
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#68,393
#123,038
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.