🆚 Headless UI vs. Styled Components
- 📈 Styled Components is three times more popular than Headless UI.
- 🌎 Styled Components is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 Headless UI is more popular in Indonesia, Uzbekistan, and Mongolia.
Headless UI
Styled ComponentsType
About
Headless UI is an open-source library of unstyled, fully accessible UI components designed for 
React and 
Vue applications, with close integration with 
Tailwind CSS.
It provides interactive components such as dialogs, menus, listboxes, comboboxes, tabs, switches, and popovers, implements keyboard navigation and 
ARIA accessibility patterns, and supplies only the behavior and accessibility logic so developers can apply any design system, 
CSS framework, or custom styling.
Styled-components is an open-source CSS-in-JS library for React that allows developers to define component styles directly within 
JavaScript and 
TypeScript code.
It generates unique class names to scope styles automatically, supports dynamic styling based on component props, theming through React context, server-side rendering, and automatic vendor prefixing.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Indonesia in the Components category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Norway in the Components category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Sweden in the Components category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Belgium in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Ireland in the Components category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Taiwan in the Components category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Sweden in the Components category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Denmark in the Components category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Finland in the Components category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Poland in the Components category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
AMP
Polymer
MIP
Normalize.css
Hover.css
Emotion
StyleX🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,533,726 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.