🆚 HubSpot CMS vs. Ring Publishing
- 📈 HubSpot CMS is much more popular than Ring Publishing.
- 🌎 HubSpot CMS is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 Ring Publishing is more popular in Poland, Serbia, and Hungary.
Ring PublishingType
About
HubSpot CMS is a hosted platform for building websites, blogs, landing pages, apps, and emails that integrates tightly with 
HubSpot CRM and other marketing tools.
It includes a theme library, a drag-and-drop editor, built-in SEO recommendations, content personalization based on CRM data, and over 2,000 marketplace integrations.
Ring Publishing is a cloud-based content experience platform from Ringier Axel Springer Media AG that provides a headless and hybrid CMS with integrated engagement and monetization tools for media organizations.
It is built as a modular SaaS platform with a composable architecture and API-first approach, supports custom content types, advanced editorial workflows, multisite management, and digital and video asset handling, and includes AI editorial assistants, personalization, A/B testing, and analytics.
Headquarters
Pricing
(3 seats)$500/month
(5 seats)$1,500/month
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Finland in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Mexico in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Colombia in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Poland in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
WordPress
Joomla
Drupal
Adobe Experience Manager
Craft
Blox CMS
Arc XP
Metro Publisher
Axel Springer company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.