🆚 Humans.txt vs. RDF
- 📈 RDF is three times more popular than Humans.txt.
- 🌎 RDF is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 Humans.txt is more popular in the Cayman Islands, Trinidad and Tobago, and Guernsey.
Type
About
Humans.txt is a plain text file that allows website creators to identify and credit the people involved in developing a website.
It may include information about developers, designers, and technologies used on the site, and is typically referenced through the <link rel="author"> HTML element.
Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a W3C standard model for describing and exchanging graph-based data on the web.
It enables linking and integration of data across different vocabularies, represents information as subject-predicate-object triples forming directed graphs, and supports serialization formats such as RDF/XML for XML-based data exchange as well as Turtle and
JSON-LD.
Headquarters
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 18th most popular in Belgium in the Standards category.
- 🔥 19th most popular in Norway in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in the Netherlands in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in Australia in the Standards category.
- ⬆️ 23rd most popular in Austria in the Standards category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Nepal in the Standards category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Kenya in the Standards category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Senegal in the Standards category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Uganda in the Standards category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Myanmar in the Standards category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,795 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Humans.txt
LLMs.txt