🆚 Ibexa DXP vs. Sulu
- 📈 Ibexa DXP is slightly more popular than Sulu.
- 🌍 Ibexa DXP is more popular in France, Germany, and Canada.
- 🌍 Sulu is more popular in the Netherlands, Austria, and Belgium.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
Ibexa DXP is a technology platform that empowers businesses to create and manage content, deliver it across multiple channels, and personalize the customer experience.
Headquarters
Oslo, Norway
Dornbirn, Austria
Pricing
Free version ✔️Open source
Ibexa Headless€30,000+/year
Ibexa Experience€38,000+/year
Ibexa Commerce€45,000+/year
Free ✔️Open source
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Ibexa DXP CMS is 1.2 times more popular than Sulu.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Ibexa DXP is more popular in France, Germany, and Canada, while Sulu is more popular in the Netherlands, Austria, and Belgium.
France
Germany
Netherlands
Austria
Belgium
Poland
Canada
Spain
United Kingdom
Switzerland
Awards
- 🔥 16th most popular in France in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 44th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 33rd most popular in France in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 34th most popular in the Netherlands in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 45th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Ibexa DXP is more popular among sites focused on business, travel, and finance and banking, while Sulu is more commonly used on marketing and merchandising, sports, and software and hardware sites.
Business
Travel
Finance/Banking
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Art/Culture/Heritage
Internet Services
Public Information
Real Estate
General News
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Pagekit