🆚 ImagesLoaded vs. XRegExp
- 📈 ImagesLoaded is much more popular than XRegExp.
- 🌍 ImagesLoaded is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
A JavaScript library that detects when images have been loaded.
XRegExp provides augmented and extensible JavaScript regular expressions.
Headquarters
Alexandria, Virginia, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source
Categories
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #5
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #262
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The ImagesLoaded JavaScript library is 1,196 times more popular than XRegExp.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
ImagesLoaded is more popular than XRegExp in all countries.
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Spain
Italy
France
Australia
Brazil
India
Netherlands
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Samoa in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Guinea in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Germany in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in South Africa in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Austria in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 174th most popular in Belgium in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 228th most popular in France in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⬆️ 252nd most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
ImagesLoaded is more popular than XRegExp in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Travel
Entertainment
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Health
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
XRegExp
TinyMCE