🆚 iMatrix vs. Tebra
- 📈 iMatrix is much more popular than Tebra.
- 🌍 iMatrix is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Content management system
Content management system
About
iMatrix provides advanced website and digital marketing solutions for small to medium-sized health and wellness practices.
Tebra is the practice automation solution that includes content management, online scheduling, automated appointment reminders, secure text messaging, credit card processing, and more.
Headquarters
El Segundo, California, United States
Newport Beach, California, United States
Pricing
Free version ❌
Custom
Categories
CMS › Rank #35
CMS › Rank #93
Scheduling › Rank #7
Scheduling › Rank #34
EHR › Rank #1
EHR › Rank #5
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The iMatrix CMS is 7 times more popular than Tebra.
Total websites
Market share
CMS
Scheduling
EHR
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
iMatrix is more popular than Tebra in all countries.
United States
Canada
Australia
India
Netherlands
United Arab Emirates
Moldova
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the EHR category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in the United States in the Scheduling category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in the United States in the EHR category.
- ⬆️ 21st most popular in the United States in the Scheduling category.
- ⬆️ 47th most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
iMatrix is more popular than Tebra in all market segments.
Health
Marketing/Merchandising
Business
Online Shopping
Fashion/Beauty
Blogs/Wiki
Sports
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Real Estate
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.