🆚 Imperva WAF vs. Myra
- 📈 Imperva WAF is much more popular than Myra.
- 🌎 Imperva WAF is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
- 🌍 Myra is more popular in Germany and Slovakia.
Type
About
Imperva Cloud WAF protects websites from automated vulnerability scans, Layer 7 DDoS attacks, and malicious bots. It also provides advanced bot protection using device fingerprinting with over 200 attributes, threat intelligence feeds, managed rules, and attack analytics to block or control suspicious traffic.
Myra is a German security-as-a-service platform offering DDoS mitigation, a hyperscale web application firewall, deep bot management, CDN, secure DNS, and real-time traffic filtering.
It differentiates itself by operating from German data centres with strict EU and national compliance, claiming SLA availability of up to 99.999%, defending against attacks over 50 Tbps, and provisioning fast threat detection and mitigation in under one second.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Spain in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in France in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Germany in the Bot Mitigation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
AWS WAF Captcha
Oracle WAF
Cloudflare Bot Management
Akamai Bot Manager
Datadome🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,511,995 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.