🆚 Imperva WAF vs. Wordfence
- 📈 Wordfence is three times more popular than Imperva WAF.
- 🌎 Wordfence is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia.
- 🌍 Imperva WAF is more popular in Japan, New Zealand, and Thailand.
Imperva WAF
WordfenceType
About
Imperva Cloud WAF protects websites from automated vulnerability scans, Layer 7 DDoS attacks, and malicious bots.
It also provides advanced bot protection using device fingerprinting with over 200 attributes, threat intelligence feeds, managed rules, and attack analytics to block or control suspicious traffic.
Wordfence is a 
WordPress security plugin that provides a web application firewall and malware scanner to protect websites from hacking attempts, malicious traffic, and vulnerable code.
It features an endpoint firewall integrated directly with WordPress, malware detection for over 44,000 known variants, file integrity checks against the WordPress repository, brute force login protection with two-factor authentication, real-time traffic monitoring, and IP and country blocking.
Headquarters
Pricing
(real-time signatures) $149/year
(hands-on support) $490/year
(1-hour response time) $1250/year
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in New Zealand in the WAF category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Thailand in the WAF category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Mexico in the WAF category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the WAF category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in New Zealand in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the WAF category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Australia in the WAF category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Spain in the WAF category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the WAF category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the WAF category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,827,731 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.