🆚 Imperva WAF vs. Yandex Smart Web Security
- 📈 Imperva WAF is much more popular than Yandex Smart Web Security.
- 🌎 Imperva WAF is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
- 🌍 Yandex Smart Web Security is more popular in Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan.
Type
About
Imperva Cloud WAF protects websites from automated vulnerability scans, Layer 7 DDoS attacks, and malicious bots. It also provides advanced bot protection using device fingerprinting with over 200 attributes, threat intelligence feeds, managed rules, and attack analytics to block or control suspicious traffic.
Yandex Smart Web Security is a cloud-based security service from Yandex Cloud that protects web applications and APIs at the OSI model's application layer (L7) against DDoS attacks, malicious bots, and other web-based threats.
It provides configurable security profiles with machine-learning-driven Smart Protection rules, bot traffic filtering and Yandex SmartCaptcha checks, and a web application firewall for common exploit patterns including OWASP Top-10 threats.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Spain in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Australia in the Bot Mitigation category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in France in the Bot Mitigation category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Russia in the Bot Mitigation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
AWS WAF Captcha
Oracle WAF
DDoS Guard
Servicepipe🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,511,995 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.