🆚 Intro.js vs. Userflow
- 📈 Intro.js is much more popular than Userflow.
- 🌎 Intro.js is more popular in the United States, Korea, and Germany.
- 🌍 Userflow is more popular in the Netherlands and Sweden.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Digital adoption platform
Digital adoption platform
About
Intro.js is a lightweight JavaScript library for creating step-by-step and powerful customer onboarding tours.
Userflow is a nocode user onboarding platform that enables rapid deployment of onboarding flows and in-app guides without the need for developers.
Headquarters
Dublin, Ireland
San Francisco, California, United States
Pricing
Free version ✔️ Versions older than v2.0.0 or for non-commercial use, open source
Starter (one project) $9.99
Business (5 projects) $49.99
Premium (unlimited projects) $299.99
Free version ❌
Startup $300+/month
Pro $850+/month
Enterprise Custom
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Intro.js digital adoption platform is 7 times more popular than Userflow.
Total websites
Market share
Digital Adoption
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Intro.js is more popular in the United States, Korea, and Germany, while Userflow is more popular in the Netherlands and Sweden.
United States
Korea
Germany
Netherlands
United Kingdom
Japan
France
Brazil
Czech Republic
Russia
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Korea in the Digital Adoption category.
- ⬆️ 104th most popular in Korea in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Intro.js is more popular than Userflow in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Travel
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Public Information
Health
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Userflow



