🆚 Intro.js vs. Pendo
- 📈 Pendo is noticeably more popular than Intro.js.
- 🌎 Pendo is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada.
- 🌍 Intro.js is more popular in Germany, Korea, and France.
Type
About
Intro.js is a lightweight open-source JavaScript library for creating step-by-step onboarding tours in web applications.
It defines tours as steps that highlight page elements or show centered messages, and supports clickable pulsing hints and theming.
Pendo is a product experience and digital adoption platform that helps companies analyze user behavior, deliver in-app guidance, collect feedback, and improve software adoption across web and mobile applications.
The platform provides event tracking, feature adoption reports, onboarding walkthroughs, tooltips and guides, NPS and in-app surveys, session replay, and AI-assisted insights, and supports integrations with platforms such as Salesforce,
HubSpot,
Jira,
Slack, and
Zendesk.
Headquarters
Pricing
(1 project) $9.99
(5 projects) $49.99
(unlimited projects) $299.99
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Korea in the Digital Adoption category.
- ⬆️ 105th most popular in Korea in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Digital Adoption category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Digital Adoption category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in the United States in the Feedback category.
- ⬆️ 47th most popular in the United States in the Analytics category.
- ⬆️ 72nd most popular in the United Kingdom in the Analytics category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,001,723 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.



