🆚 Intro.js vs. Userpilot
- 📈 Intro.js is slightly more popular than Userpilot.
- 🌎 Intro.js is more popular in India, the United Kingdom, and Brazil.
- 🌎 Userpilot is more popular in the United States, Switzerland, and Korea.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Digital adoption platform
Digital adoption platform
About
Intro.js is a lightweight 
JavaScript library for creating step-by-step and powerful customer onboarding tours.
Userpilot is a product growth platform that drives user activation, feature adoption, and expansion revenue.
Headquarters
Dublin, Ireland
Austin, Texas, United States
Pricing
Free version ✔️Versions older than v2.0.0 or for non-commercial use, open source
Starter (one project)$9.99
Business (5 projects)$49.99
Premium (unlimited projects)$299.99
Free version ❌
Starter
(2,000 MAU)$2,988+/year
(2,000 MAU)$2,988+/year
Growth$9,588+/year
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Intro.js digital adoption platform is 1.1 times more popular than Userpilot.
Total websites
Market share
Digital Adoption
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Intro.js is more popular in India, the United Kingdom, and Brazil, while Userpilot is more popular in the United States, Switzerland, and Korea.
United States
Canada
India
United Kingdom
Brazil
Australia
Germany
France
Greece
Ukraine
Awards
- ⬆️ 267th most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in the United States in the Digital Adoption category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Intro.js is more popular among sites focused on education and reference, public information, and games, while Userpilot is more commonly used on business, online shopping, and Internet services sites.
Business
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Public Information
Software/Hardware
Blogs/Wiki
Games
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.