🆚 Intro.js vs. Userlane
- 📈 Intro.js is much more popular than Userlane.
- 🌎 Intro.js is more popular in the United States, Canada, and India.
- 🌍 Userlane is more popular in the Netherlands.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Digital adoption platform
Digital adoption platform
About
Intro.js is a lightweight JavaScript library for creating step-by-step and powerful customer onboarding tours.
Userlane is a no-code digital adoption platform that measures how employees use applications, identifies areas for improvement, and provides real-time guidance directly within any application.
Headquarters
Dublin, Ireland
Munich, Germany
Pricing
Free version ✔️Versions older than v2.0.0 or for non-commercial use, open source
Starter (one project)$9.99
Business (5 projects)$49.99
Premium (unlimited projects)$299.99
Free version ❌
Custom
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Intro.js digital adoption platform is 11 times more popular than Userlane.
Total websites
Market share
Digital Adoption
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Intro.js is more popular in the United States, Canada, and India, while Userlane is more popular in the Netherlands.
United States
Canada
India
Brazil
United Kingdom
Germany
Netherlands
Ukraine
Greece
Australia
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Intro.js is more popular than Userlane in all market segments.
Business
Public Information
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Games
Sports
Real Estate
Job Search
Online Shopping
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.