🆚 Intro.js vs. Usetiful
- 📈 Intro.js is four times more popular than Usetiful.
- 🌎 Intro.js is more popular in the United States, Canada, and Germany.
- 🌍 Usetiful is more popular in the Czech Republic and Spain.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
UsetifulType
Digital adoption platform
Digital adoption platform
About
Intro.js is a lightweight 
JavaScript library for creating step-by-step and powerful customer onboarding tours.
Usetiful is a digital adoption solution that helps companies onboard new users and employees through product features with interactive walkthroughs, tooltips, and checklists.
Headquarters
Dublin, Ireland
Tallinn, Estonia
Pricing
Free version ✔️Versions older than v2.0.0 or for non-commercial use, open source
Starter (one project)$9.99
Business (5 projects)$49.99
Premium (unlimited projects)$299.99
Free version ✔️2,000 assists, 2 team members
Plus
(5,000 assists)€39/month
(5,000 assists)€39/month
Premium
(10,000+ assists)€92+/month
(10,000+ assists)€92+/month
EnterpriseCustom
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Intro.js digital adoption platform is 4 times more popular than Usetiful.
Total websites
Market share
Digital Adoption
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Intro.js is more popular in the United States, Canada, and Germany, while Usetiful is more popular in the Czech Republic and Spain.
United States
Canada
Germany
India
Brazil
United Kingdom
Australia
France
Indonesia
Greece
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Intro.js is more popular among sites focused on business, Internet services, and education and reference, while Usetiful is more commonly used on general news sites.
Business
Internet Services
Education/Reference
Blogs/Wiki
Public Information
Marketing/Merchandising
Games
Sports
General News
Real Estate
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,795 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.