🆚 Intro.js vs. Whatfix
- 📈 Intro.js is much more popular than Whatfix.
- 🌍 Intro.js is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Whatfix is particularly popular in the United States.
Statistics based on 4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Digital adoption platform
Digital adoption platform
About
Intro.js is a lightweight open-source JavaScript library for creating step-by-step onboarding tours in web applications.
It defines tours as steps that highlight page elements or show centered messages, and supports clickable pulsing hints and theming.
Whatfix is a digital adoption platform that helps enterprises onboard, train, and support their application users.
Headquarters
Dublin, Ireland
San Jose, California, United States
Pricing
Free version ✔️ Versions older than v2.0.0 or for non-commercial use, open source
Starter
(1 project) $9.99
(1 project) $9.99
Business
(5 projects) $49.99
(5 projects) $49.99
Premium
(unlimited projects) $299.99
(unlimited projects) $299.99
Free version ❌
Custom
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Intro.js digital adoption platform is 6 times more popular than Whatfix.
Total websites
Market share
Digital Adoption
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Intro.js is more popular than Whatfix in all countries.
United States
Korea
Germany
United Kingdom
Japan
France
Brazil
Czech Republic
India
Russia
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Korea in the Digital Adoption category.
- ⬆️ 105th most popular in Korea in the JavaScript Libraries category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Intro.js is more popular than Whatfix in all market segments.
Business
Education/Reference
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Internet Services
Health
Public Information
Travel
Government/Military
Finance/Banking
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 4,009,087 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.




