🆚 Joomla vs. SilverStripe

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Content management system
Content management system

About

Joomla is an open-source content management system written in PHP.

It offers a flexible extension system with over 4,000 extensions, a template-driven architecture, access control levels, built-in multilingual support, and tools for content versioning and SEO management.

SilverStripe is an open-source content management system written in PHP for building content-driven websites.

It is based on an MVC framework and offers structured content modeling, customizable templates, inline editing, versioning, role-based permissions, REST and GraphQL APIs for headless use, and an extension ecosystem with several thousand community modules available through Packagist.

Headquarters

New York, United States
Wellington, New Zealand

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

CMS › Rank #2
CMS › Rank #27

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Joomla CMS is 29 times more popular than SilverStripe.
Total websites

Market share

CMS

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Joomla is more popular in Germany, the United States, and Italy, while SilverStripe is more popular in New Zealand.
Germany
United States
Italy
United Kingdom
Russia
Poland
Spain
France
Netherlands
Ukraine

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Joomla is more popular than SilverStripe in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Travel
Internet Services
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Blogs/Wiki

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#15,356
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.