🆚 Lark vs. WeCom
- 📈 WeCom is noticeably more popular than Lark.
- 🌍 WeCom is more popular in China, the United Kingdom, and Australia.
- 🌎 Lark is more popular in Hong Kong, Vietnam, and the United States.
Lark
WeComType
About
Lark, known as Feishu in the Chinese market, is an enterprise collaboration platform developed by ByteDance that integrates instant messaging, document collaboration, video conferencing, and calendar management.
It provides real-time translation for over 100 languages, video conferencing with in-call document co-editing, a no-code relational database for automated workflows, and a shared calendar displaying team schedules.
WeCom, formerly WeChat Work, is a Chinese cloud-based platform by Tencent for enterprise communication, team collaboration, and client management that connects businesses with 
WeChat users.
It provides group chats, video conferencing, document collaboration, customer relationship management tools, human resources management including leave requests and expense reimbursements, attendance tracking, and open APIs.
Headquarters
Pricing
(5 TB) $7.20/user/month
(15 TB) $14.40/user/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in China in the Online Collaboration category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in China in the Video Conferencing category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in China in the Instant Messaging category.
- 🥇 Most popular in China in the Online Collaboration category.
- 🥇 Most popular in China in the Video Conferencing category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in China in the Instant Messaging category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
ByteDance company profile
Tencent company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,823,966 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.