🆚 Lazy loading vs. Yottaa
- 📈 Lazy loading is much more popular than Yottaa.
- 🌍 Lazy loading is more popular in all countries.
YottaaType
About
Native lazy loading is a technique to load non-critical images and iframes marked with the loading="lazy" attribute only when needed.
Yottaa is an e-commerce-focused website optimization platform that improves page speed, strengthens security, and monitors user experience through cloud-based acceleration, analytics, and traffic control.
It combines real user monitoring, Core Web Vitals diagnostics, third-party tag auditing, and anomaly detection with optimization features such as application sequencing that controls script execution order, dynamic browser caching, adaptive image optimization, and integrated CDN and security services.
Headquarters
html.spec.whatwg.orgPricing
(up to 18M annual pageviews)$12,000/year
(up to 48M annual pageviews)$36,000/year
(up to 200M annual pageviews)$78,000/year
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Performance Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Performance Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Performance Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Spain in the Performance Optimization category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the Netherlands in the Performance Optimization category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in the United States in the Application Monitoring category.
- ⬆️ 28th most popular in the United States in the Performance Optimization category.
- ⬆️ 48th most popular in the United States in the Conversion Optimization category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Beasties
Partytown
Akamai mPulse
Web Vitals
Datadog
SpeedCurve🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.