🆚 Material Design Lite vs. Materialize

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

User interface framework
User interface framework

About

Material Design Lite (MDL) is a legacy user interface framework that implements Material Design components using plain CSS, JavaScript, and HTML without external dependencies.

It provides a set of ready-made UI components, such as buttons, layouts, cards, menus, sliders, and dialogs, a responsive grid system, and automatic component upgrading via JavaScript.

Materialize is a responsive CSS framework based on Google's Material Design guidelines.

It includes a responsive grid system, badges, buttons, cards, modals, parallax effects, and other CSS and JavaScript components.

Headquarters

Mountain View, California, United States
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Website

Pricing

Free ✔️Open source
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

UI Frameworks › Rank #22
UI Frameworks › Rank #8
Legacy › Rank #43

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Materialize UI framework is 4 times more popular than Material Design Lite.
Total websites

Market share

UI Frameworks

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Materialize is more popular in the United States, Germany, and France, while Material Design Lite is more popular in Tanzania, Costa Rica, and Liechtenstein.
United States
Germany
France
Iran
India
United Kingdom
Brazil
Italy
Spain
Russia

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Materialize is more popular than Material Design Lite in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Entertainment
General News
Travel
Blogs/Wiki
Health

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
View more ➝
Name
Rank
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.