🆚 Material Design Lite vs. MDB
- 📈 MDB is noticeably more popular than Material Design Lite.
- 🌎 MDB is more popular in the United States, France, and India.
- 🌍 Material Design Lite is more popular in Germany, Spain, and Japan.
Material Design Lite
MDBType
About
Material Design Lite (MDL) is a legacy user interface framework that implements 
Material Design components using plain 
CSS, 
JavaScript, and 
HTML without external dependencies.
It provides a set of ready-made UI components, such as buttons, layouts, cards, menus, sliders, and dialogs, a responsive grid system, and automatic component upgrading via JavaScript.
Material Design for Bootstrap (MDB) is a UI toolkit that combines Bootstrap with Google's Material Design guidelines.
It offers 700+ prebuilt UI elements, templates, and navigation patterns, supports 
jQuery, 
Angular, 
React, and 
Vue integrations, and provides customizable themes.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 11st most popular in Vietnam in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Spain in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in Japan in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🔥 17th most popular in India in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🔥 19th most popular in Germany in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Turkey in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in France in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🔥 12nd most popular in Indonesia in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in India in the UI Frameworks category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in Italy in the UI Frameworks category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Google company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.