🆚 Material UI vs. MudBlazor
- 📈 Material UI is much more popular than MudBlazor.
- 🌍 Material UI is more popular in all countries.
Material UI
MudBlazorType
About
Material UI (MUI) is an open-source 
React component library that implements Google's 
Material Design.
It offers a comprehensive suite of prebuilt components, such as buttons, cards, modals, charts, data grid, tree view, along with built-in themes, typography, and full responsiveness and accessibility.
MudBlazor is an open-source 
Blazor component library based on Material Design principles that provides developers with reusable UI elements for building modern web applications in 
C#.
It includes a comprehensive set of responsive components such as tables, dialogs, forms, navigation elements, and grids, supports both Blazor Server and 
WebAssembly, and offers built-in theming and customization with minimal 
JavaScript dependency.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Norway in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in the United States in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Iran in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in the United Kingdom in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in India in the UI Frameworks category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Materialize
Angular Material
MDB
Ant Design
Radzen Blazor🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,603,958 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.