🆚 Materialize vs. MudBlazor
- 📈 Materialize is much more popular than MudBlazor.
- 🌍 Materialize is more popular in all countries.
MudBlazorType
About
Materialize is a responsive 
CSS framework based on Google's 
Material Design guidelines.
It includes a responsive grid system, badges, buttons, cards, modals, parallax effects, and other CSS and 
JavaScript components.
MudBlazor is an open-source 
Blazor component library based on Material Design principles that provides developers with reusable UI elements for building modern web applications in 
C#.
It includes a comprehensive set of responsive components such as tables, dialogs, forms, navigation elements, and grids, supports both Blazor Server and 
WebAssembly, and offers built-in theming and customization with minimal JavaScript dependency.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Iran in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Croatia in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Saudi Arabia in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in India in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Turkey in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⬆️ 36th most popular in the United States in the UI Frameworks category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Material UI
Angular Material
Material Design Lite
AngularJS Material
Bootstrap
Tailwind CSS
Radzen Blazor
BlazorBootstrap🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.