🆚 Memcached vs. Supabase
- 📈 Memcached is much more popular than Supabase.
- 🌍 Memcached is more popular in all countries.
Memcached
SupabaseType
About
Memcached is an open-source event-based key-value store that keeps data in memory to deliver very low latency access and high throughput.
It can handle over 200,000 operations per second on fast hardware, uses multi-threading to leverage multiple CPU cores, and applies Least Recently Used cache eviction policy when it runs out of memory.
Supabase is an open-source backend-as-a-service platform based on 
PostgreSQL.
It provides a hosted Postgres database with RESTful and 
GraphQL APIs, built-in authentication, secure file storage, support for edge functions written in 
TypeScript with global deployment, role-based access control, and row-level security.
Headquarters
Pricing
(8 GB per project, 100K MAU)$25+/month
(+ SSO)$599+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Canada in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in New Zealand in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Mexico in the Databases category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Switzerland in the Databases category.
- 🥇 Most popular in China in the Authentication category.
- 🥉 Third most popular in Sweden in the Authentication category.
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Brazil in the Authentication category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in China in the Databases category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in France in the Authentication category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Amazon DynamoDB
Bigtable
RocksDB
Tarantool
Amazon Web Services
Microsoft Azure
Firebase🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.