🆚 n8n vs. Zapier
- 📈 Zapier is much more popular than n8n.
- 🌎 Zapier is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
- 🌍 n8n is more popular in Russia, Argentina, and Korea.
n8n
ZapierType
About
n8n is an AI workflow automation platform that enables users to connect applications, APIs, and data sources to automate tasks and build multi-step processes through a visual low-code editor.
It offers a node-based drag-and-drop workflow builder, support for custom 
JavaScript or Python logic, webhook and API triggers, AI agent workflows with LLM integrations, self-hosting via 
Docker or 
Kubernetes, over 500 integrations, and more than 1,700 ready workflow templates.
Zapier is a no-code automation tool that lets users connect apps and services to create automated workflows called Zaps without writing code.
It supports connections to over 10,000 applications, visual workflow building with multi-step logic and conditional filters, pre-built templates, webhooks for custom integrations, AI-assisted workflow creation, and built-in data tools such as Tables and Interfaces.
Headquarters
Pricing
(1 project, 2.5K workflow executions)$24/month
(3 projects, 10K+ workflow executions)$60+/month
(6 projects, 40K+ workflow executions)$960+/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Automation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Automation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Australia in the Automation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in France in the Automation category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Automation category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Make🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.