🆚 Orchard Core vs. Plone
- 📈 Plone is five times more popular than Orchard Core.
- 🌍 Plone is more popular in Belgium, Spain, and Germany.
- 🌍 Orchard Core is more popular in the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic, and New Zealand.
Type
About
Orchard Core is an open-source, modular content management system and application framework built on ASP.NET Core that allows multiple sites to run from a single installation and supports both traditional and headless content delivery.
It provides a plug-in architecture with customizable content types, site isolation within one instance, built-in REST and GraphQL APIs, media and multilingual management, and Liquid templating.
Plone is an open-source enterprise content management system built with Python and the Zope application server for managing scalable and content-rich websites.
It features a React-based frontend editor, workflow-driven content management with versioning and collaboration, a REST API for headless delivery, multilingual support in over 30 languages, and enterprise authentication integrations such as LDAP, Active Directory,
OpenID, and
Shibboleth.
Headquarters
Pricing
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⬆️ 40th most popular in the United Kingdom in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 103rd most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Belgium in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Spain in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Brazil in the CMS category.
- 🔥 15th most popular in Austria in the CMS category.
- 🔥 17th most popular in Italy in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Contentstack