🆚 Orchard Core vs. Sanity
- 📈 Sanity is much more popular than Orchard Core.
- 🌎 Sanity is more popular in the United States, Norway, and the United Kingdom.
- 🌍 Orchard Core is more popular in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Slovakia.
SanityType
About
Orchard Core is an open-source, modular content management system and application framework built on 
ASP.NET Core that allows multiple sites to run from a single installation and supports both traditional and headless content delivery.
It provides a plug-in architecture with customizable content types, site isolation within one instance, built-in REST and 
GraphQL APIs, media and multilingual management, and Liquid templating.
Sanity is a cloud-based headless CMS that stores content as structured data in a hosted content lake and delivers it via APIs to any frontend.
It features a customizable open-source editing Studio built with 
React, real-time collaboration support, its own query language for 
JSON called GROQ (Graph-Relational Object Queries) alongside GraphQL, an asset pipeline with image transformations, versioning, localization, and enterprise capabilities such as SSO and role-based access.
Headquarters
Pricing
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥈 Second most popular in Norway in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Sweden in the CMS category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Denmark in the CMS category.
- 🔥 13rd most popular in Australia in the CMS category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in the United States in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Storyblok
Strapi
Contentstack
CoreMedia
Contentful
DatoCMS
Amplience
Payload CMS
.NET Foundation company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,604,716 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.