🆚 Plone vs. Storyblok
- 📈 Storyblok is three times more popular than Plone.
- 🌎 Storyblok is more popular in the United States, Germany, and the Netherlands.
- 🌍 Plone is more popular in Belgium, Spain, and Italy.
Plone
StoryblokType
About
Plone is an open-source enterprise content management system built with Python and the 
Zope application server for managing scalable and content-rich websites.
It features a 
React-based frontend editor, workflow-driven content management with versioning and collaboration, a REST API for headless delivery, multilingual support in over 30 languages, and enterprise authentication integrations such as LDAP, Active Directory, 
OpenID, and 
Shibboleth.
Storyblok is an enterprise-grade headless content management system with a visual editor.
It provides a component-based content model, drag-and-drop live preview editing for non-technical users, built-in localization, versioning and audit trails, global caching via 
CloudFront CDN, and 
GraphQL and REST APIs.
Headquarters
Pricing
(5 users) $99/month
(15 users) $349/month
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Belgium in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Spain in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Brazil in the CMS category.
- 🔥 16th most popular in Italy in the CMS category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in France in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Sweden in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in the Netherlands in the CMS category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Austria in the CMS category.
- 🔥 11st most popular in Belgium in the CMS category.
- 🔥 14th most popular in Germany in the CMS category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,823,966 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.