🆚 Ruffle vs. Slick
- 📈 Slick is much more popular than Ruffle.
- 🌍 Slick is more popular in all countries.
Statistics based on 3.8M+ analyzed websites. About this data
SlickType
JavaScript library
JavaScript library
About
Ruffle is an Adobe Flash Player emulator written in the 
Rust programming language.
Slick is an open-source 
jQuery carousel library for creating responsive, touch-enabled, and keyboard-accessible content sliders.
It offers more than 50 configuration options, responsive breakpoint-specific settings, infinite looping, lazy loading, variable-width and vertical layouts, synchronized sliders, and 
CSS3 transitions.
Headquarters
New York, United States
Pricing
Free ✔️ Open source
Free ✔️ Open source
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Slick JavaScript library is 347 times more popular than Ruffle.
Total websites
Market share
JavaScript Libraries
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Slick is more popular than Ruffle in all countries.
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Russia
India
Italy
Spain
Brazil
Awards
- ⬆️ 222nd most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Japan in the Sliders category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the U.S. Virgin Islands in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Sliders category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Japan in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United Kingdom in the Sliders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Slick is more popular than Ruffle in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Travel
Internet Services
Sports
Health
Blogs/Wiki
Entertainment
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.