🆚 Shortcuts vs. Square Appointments
- 📈 Square Appointments is twice as popular as Shortcuts.
- 🌎 Square Appointments is more popular in the United States and Japan.
- 🌍 Shortcuts is more popular in Australia, the United Kingdom, and Spain.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Scheduling software
Scheduling software
About
Shortcuts is salon, spa and barber software that handles everything from appointment scheduling to transactions.
Square Appointments is an all-in-one appointment scheduling and payment processing point of sale.
Headquarters
Brisbane, Australia
Oakland, California, United States
Pricing
ShortcutsAire
Free version ✔️
Grow$29/month
Pro$39/month
ShortcutsFusionCustom
Free version ✔️For a single location
Plus$29/location/month
Premium$69/location/month
Categories
Scheduling › Rank #69
Scheduling › Rank #48
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Square Appointments scheduling software is 2.3 times more popular than Shortcuts.
Total websites
Market share
Scheduling
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Square Appointments is more popular in the United States and Japan, while Shortcuts is more popular in Australia, the United Kingdom, and Spain.
United States
Australia
United Kingdom
Canada
Japan
Spain
France
Belgium
Georgia
New Zealand
Awards
- 🔥 20th most popular in Australia in the Scheduling category.
- ⬆️ 27th most popular in the United States in the Scheduling category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Square Appointments is more popular than Shortcuts in all market segments.
Fashion/Beauty
Health
Internet Services
Marketing/Merchandising
Potentially Unwanted Programs
Art/Culture/Heritage
Business
Education/Reference
Real Estate
Sports
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.