🆚 ABlyft vs. OptiMonk

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

A/B testing tool
Conversion optimization tool

About

ABlyft is an A/B testing platform with a powerful visual editor and a focus on developers.

OptiMonk is a conversion rate optimization tool that provides popups, gamification widgets, website personalization, and A/B testing.

Headquarters

Kiel, Germany
Debrecen, Hungary

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️
Custom
Free version ✔️1 domain, 10K pageviews per month
Essential (20K pageviews)$29/month
Growth (100K pageviews)$99/month
Premium (500K pageviews)$249/month

Categories

A/B Testing › Rank #27
A/B Testing › Rank #8
Conversion Optimization › Rank #20

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The OptiMonk conversion optimization tool is 6 times more popular than ABlyft.
Total websites

Market share

A/B Testing

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

OptiMonk is more popular in Hungary, the United States, and the United Kingdom, while ABlyft is more popular in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.
Hungary
United States
Germany
United Kingdom
Australia
France
Netherlands
India
Romania
Italy

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

OptiMonk is more popular among sites focused on online shopping, business, and marketing and merchandising, while ABlyft is more commonly used on provocative attire sites.
Online Shopping
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Fashion/Beauty
Internet Services
Travel
Finance/Banking
Education/Reference
Health
Recreation/Hobbies

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#2,001
#11,627
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#1,333
#7,058
#7,767
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.