🆚 AMP vs. Material UI
- 📈 AMP is much more popular than Material UI.
- 🌎 AMP is more popular in Indonesia, the United States, and Russia.
- 🌍 Material UI is more popular in Sweden, Norway, and Uzbekistan.
AMP
Material UIType
About
AMP, short for Accelerated Mobile Pages, is an open-source 
HTML framework originally created by 
Google for building lightweight web pages optimized for fast loading on mobile devices.
It uses a restricted set of HTML components, asynchronous resource loading, sandboxed 
JavaScript, and a component library for images, video, advertising, analytics, and interactive content.
Material UI (MUI) is an open-source 
React component library that implements Google's 
Material Design.
It offers a comprehensive suite of prebuilt components, such as buttons, cards, modals, charts, data grid, tree view, along with built-in themes, typography, and full responsiveness and accessibility.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Indonesia in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Turkey in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Singapore in the Components category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Korea in the Components category.
- ⭐ 6th most popular in Indonesia in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Israel in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 8th most popular in Norway in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in the United States in the UI Frameworks category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in France in the UI Frameworks category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
OpenJS Foundation company profile🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,827,731 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.