🆚 Apache Cocoon vs. Owl Carousel
- 📈 Owl Carousel is much more popular than Apache Cocoon.
- 🌍 Owl Carousel is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Apache Cocoon is particularly popular in France.
Apache Cocoon
Owl CarouselType
About
Apache Cocoon was an open-source 
Java web application framework built around 
XML processing and retired in January 2025.
It used a pipeline architecture with generators, transformers, and serializers to convert XML into outputs such as 
HTML, PDF, and RTF, emphasized separation of content, logic, and presentation, and integrated with XSLT, XQuery, and the Spring framework.
Owl Carousel is a deprecated open-source 
jQuery plugin for creating responsive, touch-enabled, and accessible carousel sliders.
It offers more than 60 configuration options, responsive breakpoint settings, touch and mouse drag support, infinite looping, autoplay, lazy loading, auto-width items, and CSS3 hardware-accelerated transitions with CSS2 fallback for older browsers.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in the United States in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the United Kingdom in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Italy in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Germany in the Legacy category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
Jakarta Servlet
Apache Sling
Jakarta Server Pages
Spring
Swiper
Slick
Flickity
Splide
Tiny Slider🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,603,958 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.