🆚 BitNinja vs. Prophaze WAF
- 📈 BitNinja is four times more popular than Prophaze WAF.
- 🌎 BitNinja is more popular in the United States, Spain, and Romania.
- 🌍 Prophaze WAF is more popular in India.
Statistics based on 3.4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Website security tool
Bot mitigation tool
About
BitNinja is a server security suite with a centralized dashboard containing an AI-powered 
Linux malware scanner, IP reputation, WAF, and spam detection.
Prophaze WAF is a native cloud web application firewall that protects web applications from malicious requests using behavioral threat detection algorithms.
Headquarters
Debrecen, Hungary
Clappana, Kerala, India
Pricing
Free version ✔️For servers with up to 2 CPU cores and 2MB RAM
Depends on server specs and user count$5+/month
Free version ❌
Custom
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The BitNinja security tool is 4 times more popular than Prophaze WAF.
Total websites
Market share
Bot Mitigation
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
BitNinja is more popular in the United States, Spain, and Romania, while Prophaze WAF is more popular in India.
India
United States
Spain
Romania
Poland
Netherlands
Thailand
Brazil
Hungary
United Kingdom
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
BitNinja is more popular among sites focused on entertainment and blogs and wiki, while Prophaze WAF is more commonly used on business sites.
Business
Entertainment
Blogs/Wiki
Marketing/Merchandising
Forum/Bulletin Boards
Portal Sites
Potentially Unwanted Programs
Search Engines
Auctions/Classifieds
Potential Illegal Software
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
AWS WAF Captcha
Oracle WAF🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.