🆚 Caddy vs. Google Cloud Load Balancing
- 📈 Google Cloud Load Balancing is four times more popular than Caddy.
- 🌎 Google Cloud Load Balancing is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
- 🌍 Caddy is more popular in Germany, Romania, and Russia.
Type
About
Caddy is an open-source multi-platform web server written in
Go with built-in support for automatic HTTPS and modern web protocols.
It supports automatic TLS management with providers such as Let's Encrypt and ZeroSSL, includes a built-in reverse proxy with load balancing, offers configuration through the human-readable Caddyfile or a JSON-based REST API, and features a modular architecture that can be extended with plugins.
Google Cloud Load Balancing is a managed load balancing service that distributes application traffic across virtual machines and containers on Google Cloud.
It supports global and regional load balancing, a single anycast IP address for worldwide deployments, automatic scaling without pre-warming, integration with Cloud CDN and Cloud Armor, and uses
Envoy and
Google Front End proxies to route and manage traffic.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- ⭐ 4th most popular in Germany in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Austria in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Romania in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Belgium in the Web Servers category.
- ⭐ 5th most popular in Bulgaria in the Web Servers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the British Virgin Islands in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Canada in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Brazil in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Australia in the Load Balancers category.
- 🥇 Most popular in India in the Load Balancers category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,814,833 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.


