🆚 Fluent vs. Material Design

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Design system
Design system

About

Fluent Design System is Microsoft's cross-platform design language that defines how user interfaces should look and behave across Windows, web, and mobile applications.

It uses a unified set of design tokens for colors, spacing, icons, and typography, and supports adaptive layouts for different screen sizes.

Material Design is a design system developed by Google that defines a unified visual and interaction language used across Android, web, and other platforms.

It uses grid-based layouts, consistent color palettes and typography, interactive "elevation" shadows and lighting to convey depth, motion and animation for user feedback and transitions, and a comprehensive set of ready-to-use UI components.

Headquarters

Redmond, Washington, United States
Mountain View, California, United States

Website

Categories

Design Systems › Rank #6
Design Systems › Rank #1

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

Material Design technology is 50 times more popular than Fluent.
Total websites

Market share

Design Systems

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Material Design is more popular than Fluent in all countries.
United States
Germany
France
India
United Kingdom
Brazil
Spain
Iran
Italy
Russia

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Material Design is more popular than Fluent in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Internet Services
Travel
Entertainment
Finance/Banking
Health
General News

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#7,681
#27,775
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#317
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.