🆚 Google URL Shortener vs. Namo WebEditor
- 📈 Google URL Shortener is much more popular than Namo WebEditor.
- 🌍 Google URL Shortener is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Namo WebEditor is particularly popular in Korea.
Statistics based on 3.5M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Legacy technology
HTML editor
About
Google URL Shortener is a deprecated link service from Google.
Namo WebEditor is a legacy WYSIWYG HTML editor that was discontinued in 2011.
Headquarters
Mountain View, California, United States
Korea
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Google URL Shortener legacy technology is 411 times more popular than Namo WebEditor.
Total websites
Market share
Legacy
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Google URL Shortener is more popular than Namo WebEditor in all countries.
United States
Japan
Spain
Australia
Germany
India
Brazil
Italy
United Kingdom
Canada
Awards
- 🥇 Most popular in Taiwan in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Paraguay in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in the U.S. Virgin Islands in the Legacy category.
- 🥇 Most popular in Puerto Rico in the Legacy category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in the United States in the Legacy category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Korea in the HTML Editors category.
- ⭐ 10th most popular in Germany in the HTML Editors category.
- ⬆️ 22nd most popular in Korea in the Legacy category.
- ⬆️ 61st most popular in Germany in the Legacy category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Google URL Shortener is more popular than Namo WebEditor in all market segments.
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Online Shopping
Health
Travel
Internet Services
Real Estate
Non-Profit/Advocacy/NGO
Restaurants
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,690 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.
Namo WebEditor
Skype