🆚 ImobiBrasil vs. Placester
- 📈 Placester is slightly more popular than ImobiBrasil.
- 🌎 Placester is more popular in the United States.
- 🌎 ImobiBrasil is more popular in Brazil.
Statistics based on 3.4M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Website builder
Website builder
About
ImobiBrasil is a Brazilian real-estate platform that combines website building with CRM capabilities, including sales funnels, contract generation, and integrations with WhatsApp and major real estate portals.
Placester is a WordPress-based website builder for real estate agents and teams, featuring 30 designer-crafted templates, an integrated CRM, live chat, and lead capture tools.
Headquarters
Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Pricing
Free version ❌Free 7-day trial
54.99+ BRL/month
Free version ❌
For Agents
Agent Essential$59/month
Agent Plus$79/month
Agent Premier$129/month
Premier + Content$329/month
For Brokers & teams
Team$199/month
Broker Standard$399/month
Broker Plus$599/month
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The Placester website builder is 1.1 times more popular than ImobiBrasil.
Total websites
Market share
Website Builders
CRM
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Placester is more popular in the United States, while ImobiBrasil is more popular in Brazil.
Brazil
United States
United Kingdom
Awards
- ⭐ 7th most popular in Brazil in the CRM category.
- ⭐ 9th most popular in Brazil in the Website Builders category.
- ⬆️ 32nd most popular in the United States in the CRM category.
- ⬆️ 54th most popular in the United States in the Website Builders category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Placester is more popular than ImobiBrasil in all market segments.
Real Estate
General News
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,406,701 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.