🆚 Imperva WAF vs. Qrator

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Bot mitigation technology
Bot mitigation technology

About

Imperva Cloud WAF protects websites from automated vulnerability scans, Layer 7 DDoS attacks, and malicious bots. It also provides advanced bot protection using device fingerprinting with over 200 attributes, threat intelligence feeds, managed rules, and attack analytics to block or control suspicious traffic.

Qrator is a company of Russian origin that offers cloud-based Web Application Firewall (WAF) and DDoS protection services. Its solutions include advanced DNS security, Layer 7 DDoS mitigation, and comprehensive cybersecurity for data protection.

Headquarters

San Mateo, California, United States
Prague, Czech Republic

Website

Pricing

Free version ❌Free 30-day trial
SecureSphere WAF$7,000+/year
Free version ❌
23,000 RUB/month

Categories

Bot Mitigation › Rank #3
Bot Mitigation › Rank #8

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

Imperva WAF bot mitigation technology is 7 times more popular than Qrator.
Total websites

Market share

Bot Mitigation

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Imperva WAF is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan, while Qrator is more popular in Russia, the Czech Republic, and Cyprus.
United States
Russia
United Kingdom
Japan
Spain
Australia
France
Canada
Germany
Italy

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Imperva WAF is more popular than Qrator in all market segments.
Business
Sports
Finance/Banking
Marketing/Merchandising
Online Shopping
Education/Reference
Health
Internet Services
Travel
Entertainment

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#1,009
#1,156
#1,283
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#277
#1,239
#1,445
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.