🆚 Intro.js vs. WalkMe
- 📈 WalkMe is noticeably more popular than Intro.js.
- 🌎 WalkMe is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia.
- 🌍 Intro.js is more popular in Canada, India, and Germany.
Statistics based on 3.3M+ analyzed websites. About this data
Type
Digital adoption platform
Digital adoption platform
About
Intro.js is a lightweight JavaScript library for creating step-by-step and powerful customer onboarding tours.
WalkMe is a cloud-based digital adoption platform that overlays any application, identifies where workflows break and provides personalized guidance and automation to help users get the job done.
Headquarters
Dublin, Ireland
Walldorf, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Pricing
Free version ✔️Versions older than v2.0.0 or for non-commercial use, open source
Starter (one project)$9.99
Business (5 projects)$49.99
Premium (unlimited projects)$299.99
Free version ❌
$10,000+/year
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
The WalkMe digital adoption platform is 1.8 times more popular than Intro.js.
Total websites
Market share
Digital Adoption
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
WalkMe is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, while Intro.js is more popular in Canada, India, and Germany.
United States
United Kingdom
Canada
Australia
Italy
India
Germany
France
Brazil
Switzerland
Awards
- ⬆️ 267th most popular in the United States in the JavaScript Libraries category.
- ⭐ 7th most popular in the United States in the Digital Adoption category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
WalkMe is more popular among sites focused on business, finance and banking, and health, while Intro.js is more commonly used on public information and games sites.
Business
Finance/Banking
Health
Internet Services
Software/Hardware
Marketing/Merchandising
Education/Reference
Sports
Public Information
Games
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
See also
🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,375,483 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.