🆚 Olist vs. WordPress Download Manager
- 📈 WordPress Download Manager is much more popular than Olist.
- 🌍 WordPress Download Manager is more popular in all countries.
- ⭐ Olist is particularly popular in Brazil.
WordPress Download ManagerType
About
Olist is a Brazilian e-commerce platform formerly known as Vnda, now rebranded and integrated into the broader Olist ecosystem for digital retail.
It offers omnichannel sales, real-time order and inventory management, promotional tools, direct sales via 
WhatsApp, an open API, and connections with hundreds of third-party services.
WordPress Download Manager is a document management plugin designed to manage downloads, control file access with passwords and member roles, and sell digital products on 
WordPress sites.
It supports download limits and link expiration, tracks detailed download activity, integrates with cloud storage providers such as 
Google Drive, 
Dropbox, and 
OneDrive, and can act as a full-featured digital store by enabling pricing, cart, and checkout for paid files.
Headquarters
Pricing
Categories
Popularity
Determined by the number of sites using each technology.
Market share
Popularity by country
Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.
Awards
- 🔥 18th most popular in Brazil in the E-Commerce category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Kenya in the E-Commerce category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Nigeria in the E-Commerce category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Uganda in the E-Commerce category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in Zimbabwe in the E-Commerce category.
- 🥈 Second most popular in El Salvador in the E-Commerce category.
Popularity by domain category
Determined by the number of sites in each category.
Top sites
Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.
Compare alternatives
Technologies with similar characteristics.
WooCommerce
Shopify
PrestaShop
Wix eCommerce
Magento
Patreon
Easy Digital Downloads
Gumroad
ProfilePress🗃️ About This Data
- We evaluate the popularity of technologies based on the number of websites where we detect their usage.
- Technologies without a detectable web footprint, and those we do not track, are not reflected in the calculated market share.
- This report is based on the analysis of 3,531,795 websites.
- Statistics were last calculated on .
- For more details, see our methodology and disclaimer.