🆚 OttoKit vs. Zapier

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

Automation tool
Automation tool

About

OttoKit, formerly SureTriggers, is a WordPress plugin that allows users to create automated workflows without any coding knowledge.
Zapier is a no-code automation tool that lets you connect your apps into automated workflows.

Headquarters

Pune, Maharashtra, India
San Francisco, California, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️Open source
Pro
(5K tasks)
$9/month
Business
(10K tasks)
$19/month
Business Plus
(30K tasks)
$39/month
Free version ✔️100 tasks per month
$29.99+/month

Categories

Automation › Rank #2
Automation › Rank #1
WordPress Plugins › Rank #154

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Zapier automation tool is 1.5 times more popular than OttoKit.
Total websites

Market share

Automation

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Zapier is more popular in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, while OttoKit is more popular in India, Spain, and South Africa.
United States
United Kingdom
India
Germany
France
Australia
Canada
Spain
Brazil
Netherlands

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Zapier is more popular among sites focused on business, Internet services, and marketing and merchandising, while OttoKit is more commonly used on blogs and wiki, and general news sites.
Business
Internet Services
Marketing/Merchandising
Software/Hardware
Blogs/Wiki
Finance/Banking
Interactive Web Applications
Health
Education/Reference
Sports

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#136,675
#162,132
#179,661
Name
Rank
#2,978
#5,975

Compare alternatives

Technologies with similar characteristics.

See also

Data updated

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

When interpreting and using the results, please read our methodology and disclaimer.