🆚 Phaser vs. Pts

Compare technologies based on real-world usage data *

Type

JavaScript library
JavaScript library

About

Phaser is a fast 2D game framework with support for Canvas and WebGL rendering for building HTML5 games for desktop and mobile web browsers.

Pts is a lightweight and modular typescript library that comes with many useful algorithms for visualization and creative coding.

Headquarters

San Francisco, California, United States

Website

Pricing

Free version ✔️Open source
Developer License (+ Visual Editor + 1 GB Asset Storage + Email support)$10/month
Professional License (+ Playable Ads Project Templates + Phaser Compressor + 100 GB Asset Storage)$45/month
Free ✔️Open source

Categories

JavaScript Libraries › Rank #282
JavaScript Libraries › Rank #221
Animation › Rank #27

Popularity

Determined by the number of sites using each technology.

The Pts JavaScript library is 9 times more popular than Phaser.
Total websites

Market share

JavaScript Libraries

Popularity by country

Determined by the number of sites detected from each country.

Pts is more popular in Japan, the United States, and Spain, while Phaser is more popular in Denmark and Norway.
Japan
United States
Spain
Russia
France
United Kingdom
Ukraine
Germany
Canada
Poland

Awards

Popularity by domain category

Determined by the number of sites in each category.

Pts is more popular among sites focused on online shopping, business, and marketing and merchandising, while Phaser is more commonly used on software and hardware, and interactive web applications sites.
Online Shopping
Business
Marketing/Merchandising
Blogs/Wiki
Fashion/Beauty
Education/Reference
Sports
Entertainment
Internet Services
Travel

Top sites

Top-ranked sites that use these technologies.

Name
Rank
#9,273
#12,064
View more ➝
Name
Rank
#295
#3,780
View more ➝

See also

* According to recent studies, many of online reviews are fake.
When making your decision, it is better to rely on data that cannot be falsified.
Our service evaluates the popularity of technologies by the number of websites using them.

Statistics were last calculated on .
For details, see our methodology and disclaimer.